Wednesday, 4 January 2006
4:30 PM - 10:00 PM
Thursday, 5 January 2006
10:00 AM - 10:00 PM
Friday, 6 January 2006
8:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Salon H (Marriott Rivercenter Hotel)
Cotton Physiology Conference Posters
The Poster Board Session will be held in Marriott Rivercenter Salon H. Posters will be displayed starting at 4:30 PM on Wednesday, January 4 through the remainder of the conference. Poster Board Exhibitor Set up is scheduled from 12:00 PM till 4:00 PM on Wednesday, January 4.

Evaluation of Roundup Ready® Flex Cotton in South Carolina Michael A. Jones, Chris Main and Edward Murdock, Clemson University, Florence, SC

Field Evaluation of Roundup Ready Flex Cotton Josh Bynum and Tom Cothren, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX

Dryland Cropping Systems to Increase and Stabilize Cotton Yields During Periods of Drought John Sij, Kurt Lemon, David Bordovsky, Todd Baughman and Greg Church, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Vernon, TX

Comparison of Five Varieties in Deep Tillage and No-Till Production Systems and Response to Pentia Heather R. Robinson, Steve P. Nichols and Tim Evans, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS

Evaluation of Conservation Management Practices for Cotton Production J. E. Hanks1, Steven W. Martin2, Daniel K. Fisher1 and Steven J. Thomson1, (1)USDA, ARS, Stoneville, MS, (2)Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS

Narrow Row Spindle Picker Cotton Response to Bed Systems and Seeding Rates M.P. Harrison1, N.W. Buehring2, R.R. Dobbs2 and Michael H. Willcutt3, (1)North Mississippi Research and Extension Center, Verona, MS, (2)Mississippi State University, Verona, MS, (3)MSUES Ag. & Bio. Engineering, Mississippi State, MS

15 Inch Cotton Research in Tennessee Chism Craig, L. E. Steckel and R. M. Hayes, University of Tennessee, Jackson, TN

Evaluation of Different Plant Populations of Paymaster 2326 and Fibermax 960rr under Dryland Cotton Production Brant Baugh, Texas Cooperative Extenstion, Lubbock, TX and C. Mark Brown, Texas Cooperative Extension, Lubbock, TX

Potassium and Cultivar Effects on Partitioning of Carbohydrates Jenny D. Clement and C. Owen Gwathmey, University of Tennessee, Jackson, TN
Paper Withdrawn

Evaluation of Low-Pressure Drip Irrigation in Arkansas Bill Robertson, Frank Groves, Robert Hogan, Leo Espinoza, Claude Kennedy and Matt Cordell, University of Arkansas, Division of Agriculture, Little Rock, AR

Timing of Irrigation Termination on Sharkey Clay in Northeast Louisiana Ernest L. Clawson and Alphonse B. Coco, LSU AgCenter, St. Joseph, LA

The Effects of Water Stress During Bloom on Lint Yield, Fiber Quality and Price Shane Osborne1, J.C. Banks1, Elizabeth Wallace2 and William Stehr2, (1)Oklahoma State University, Altus, OK, (2)Western Oklahoma State College, Altus, OK

Measuring water stress in cotton in two production systems Gretchen F. Sassenrath and J. Ray Williford, USDA-ARS APTRU, Stoneville, MS

Growth and Spectral Characteristics of Cotton Approaching Water Stress Glen L. Ritchie1, Craig W. Bednarz1, Jared R. Whitaker, Cory I. Mills and Robert Leslie Millings, (1)Tifton, GA

Effect of High Temperature and Plant Growth Regulators on Fertilization, Seed Set, and Yield of Cotton Genotypes Androniki C. Bibi, Derrick M. Oosterhuis and Evangelos D. Gonias, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR

Calculation of heat units for defoliation based on ambient or internal boll temperatures Evangelos D. Gonias, Derrick M. Oosterhuis and Androniki C. Bibi, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR

Effect of Temperature on Cotton Growth Response to Mepiquat Chloride Fabio Suano de Souza1, Derrick Oosterhuis1, Ciro Rosolem2, Evangelos Gonias2 and Androniki Bibi2, (1)University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, (2)Faculdade de Ciencias Agronomicas - UNESP, Botucatu Sao Paulo, Brazil

The Effects of Nitrogen Rates and Mepiquat Chloride Applied to an Elite Cotton Variety Dustin Karl Simmons, Keith L. Edmisten, Gary S. Hamm, James E. Lanier and Guy D. Collins, NCSU Crop Science, Wendell, NC

A Comparison in Cotton of Mepiquat Chloride Activity with and without Cyclanilide Addition Robert L. Millings1, Craig Bednarz1, Herb Young2, Glen Ritchie1, Cory Mills1 and Jared Whitaker1, (1)University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, (2)Bayer Cropscience, Tifton, GA

Losses of Mepiquat Chloride from Cotton Leaves as Affected by Adjuvant and Simulated Rainfall Fabio Suano Souza, Thiago Souza Tozi, Vanessa Van Melis and Ciro Antonio Rosolem, Faculdade de Ciencias Agronomicas, Botucatu, Brazil

Effects of cotton seeds soaked with mepiquat chloride and sequential foliar application on the plant growth and yield G. T. Nagashima1, E. Miglioranza1, C. J. Marur2 and R. S. Yamaoka2, (1)State University of Londrina, Londrina, Brazil, (2)IAPAR, Londrina, Brazil

Evaluation of Mepex Gin Out Applications at Cutout
Dan D. Fromme1, Robert G. Lemon2, J. Tom Cothren3, Josh Bynum3 and Joel Pigg2, (1)Texas Cooperative Extension, Wharton, TX, (2)Texas Cooperative Extension, College Station, TX, (3)Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, TX

Losses of Chlormequat Chloride from Cotton Leaves as Affected by Adjuvant and Simulated Rainfall Thiago De Souza Tozi1, Fabio Suano de Souza2, Fernanda Pereira dos Santos1 and Ciro Antonio Rosolem1, (1)Faculdade de Ciencias Agronomicas - UNESP, Botucatu Sao Paulo, Brazil, (2)University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR

Increased Protein, Endotoxin, Insect Mortality and Yield in Cotton with ChaperoneTM (A Five Year Summary) Derrick M. Oosterhuis1, A. C. Bibi1, E. D. Gonias1 and R. S. Brown2, (1)University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, (2)Monsanto, O' Fallon, MO

Effects of the Protein Enhancer Chaperone on Boll Weight, Seeds Per Boll, and Seed Weight of Cotton across Central and Eastern Regions of the U.S Carlos J. Fernandez1, Carlos Correa1 and James Lackey2, (1)Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Corpus Christi, TX, (2)LTA Research Management, Taft, TX

Effects of the Protein Enhancer Chaperone Alone and in Combination with the Foliar Fertilizer CoRoN on Yield and Fiber Quality of Cotton Carlos J. Fernandez and Carlos Correa, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Corpus Christi, TX

Chaperone Yield Components- a Five Year Review
James H. Lackey, LTA Research, Taft, TX

A Multi-State Study into the Yield Effects of Chaperone in Commercially Grown Cotton
J.L. Taylor, Taylor Consulting, Bryan, TX, Travis Tredemeyer, Point Venture, TX, Paul Pilsner, Wharton, TX, James Powell, Lubbock, TX, Jon Hooten, Plainview, TX, Robert C. Wilbur, Wellington, TX, Tim Tyree, Greensburg, KS, Pete Cabrera, Las Cruces, NM and Tom Hayes, Paragould, AR

Influence ProActTM and Glyphosate on Roundup Ready® Flex Cotton Growth and Yield N. M. French, Eden Bioscience Corporation, Little Rock, AR and R. R. Atkins, Eden Bioscience Corporation, Bothell, WA

Chaperone Utilization in Louisiana - A Study of the Yield Effects During 2005
Bentley Curry, Rayville, LA and Reynold Minsky, Minsky Consulting Service Inc., Lake Providence, LA

Evaluations of Chaperone (atonik) plant growth enhancer applied to cotton on the Lower Texas Gulf Coast
Clinton W. Livingston, Stephen D. Livingston, Michael R. Hiller and Rudy Alaniz, Texas Cooperative Extension, Corpus Christi, TX

Evaluation of Contact Herbicides as a Follow-up Treatment for Cotton Defoliation Kelly M. Young, Patrick A. Clay and Erin L. Taylor, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

Evaluating the Performance of Reduced Rate and Standard Rate Harvest Aids for Central Texas Justin J. Scheiner, Josh Bynum and Tom Cothren, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX

Effect of the adjuvants Prep®, Dropp SC®, MFX 0543®, MFX 0307®, Finish 6 Pro®, and Cotton Quick® applied with Def 6® cotton defoliant Elizabeth J. Jones1, Steve P. Nichols1, Gene D. Wills1 and Bobby W. Alford2, (1)Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS, (2)Helena Chemical Company, Memphis, TN

Blizzard (Fluthiacet-Methyl): a New Cotton Defoliant Julius E. Fajardo1, Alan W. Dalrymple1, Keith H. Griffith1, Robert D. Hinkle1 and Peter J. Porpiglia2, (1)Chemtura Corporation, Middlebury, CT, (2)Kumiai America, White Plains, NY

WhiteoutTM, A New Boll Opener Material
O. Jay Turner, Micro Flo Company LLC, Olive Branch, MS

Evaluation of Spatial Variability of Fiber Quality, Yield, and Loan Value
Brandi C.W. Garber1, Brad Guillory1, Maurice Wolcott2 and A. M. Stewart3, (1)LSU AgCenter, Alexandria, LA, (2)Dept. of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Baton Rouge, LA, (3)LSU AgCenter, Dean Lee Research Station, Alexandria, LA

Comparison of Broadcast and Image-based, Variable Rate Application of Mepiquat Chloride on Cotton Crop Growth and Fruit Retention Using the COTMAN Crop Monitoring System – 2005 Results Tina Gray Teague1, David Wildy2, Mukhammadzakhrab Ismanov1, Jennifer Lund1, Larry Hendrickson3, Nick Emanuel3, Jeffery Willers4 and Morteza Mozaffari5, (1)University of Arkansas Agricultual Experiment Station - Arkansas State University, State University, AR, (2)Manila, AR, (3)John Deere, Urbandale, IA, (4)USDA-ARS Crop Research Laboratory, Mississippi State, MS, (5)University of Arkansas Department of Soil, Crops, and Environmental Sciences, Soil Testing Laboratory, Marianna, AR

Utility of Yield Monitors For On-Farm Research Bill Robertson, Matt Cordell, Susan Matthews and Frank Groves, University of Arkansas, Division of Agriculture, Little Rock, AR

End Trimming Plots without Influencing Yields Stewart R. Duncan, Kansas State University, Extension Agronomy, Manhattan, KS and Scott A. Staggenborg, Kansas State University, Dept. of Agronomy, Manhattan, KS

Novel Methods to Produce Cotton Somatic Embryos from Gossypium hirsutum and Other Species
M.B. Ahmedov, R.K. Shadmanov, I.N. Grigina, A.P. Abukhovskaya, B.D. Jalilov and B. Triplett, USDA-ARS, Department of Soil & Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Sponsor:Cotton Physiology Conference

See more of Cotton Physiology Conference

See more of The Beltwide Cotton Conferences, January 3-6 2006