Conventional VS. Transgenic: The Showdown

Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Salon C (Marriott Riverwalk Hotel)
R. Hogan , Texas A&M University
Jason L. Johnson , Texas Cooperative Extension
Warren L. Multer , Texas AgriLife Extension
Jeanne M. Reeves , Cotton Incorporated
The development of transgenic cotton cultivars gave cotton producers more risk management options for insect control and weed suppression.  The insect and weed suppression characteristics of transgenic cotton provide the potential to greatly reduce a common source of production risk for all cotton producers.  At the same time producers were getting all the benefits of transgenic cotton, seed vendors were beginning to charge technology surcharge fees for some portion of the enhanced profit potential brought about by this new genetically customized germplasm.  In this study, a comparison is made between a conventional dryland cotton production system using conventional cultural techniques (i.e. more tillage trips over the field and possibly additional trips for insecticide and herbicide application) and a production system utilizing Bollgard II Round-up Ready Flex technology.  The comparison employs budgets prepared to reflect common production practices for West Texas dryland cotton production.  Stochastic simulation will be applied to the model using forecasted weather, cotton yield, and cotton price.  Stochastic dominance and stochastic efficiency techniques will be used to attempt to determine which production system is superior in the long term under uncertainty and if this technology provides economically justifiable benefits for adoption in this particular region of Texas.