9308 Weed Management and Economics in Cotton Tillage Systems in the Texas High Plains

Tuesday, January 6, 2009
Salon H (Marriott Rivercenter Hotel)
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
Salon H (Marriott Rivercenter Hotel)
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Salon H (Marriott Rivercenter Hotel)
Andrew Bloodworth1, P. A. Dotray2, J. W. Keeling3, L.V. Gilbert3, B. W. Bean4 and J. W. Johnson5, (1)Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, (2)Texas Tech University, AgriLife Research, and Texas AgriLife Extension Service, Lubbock, TX, (3)Texas AgriLife Research, Lubbock, TX, (4)Texas AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Amarillo, TX, (5)Texas Tech University and Texas AgriLife Extension Service, Lubbock, TX
Field studies were conducted in 2007 and 2008 to evaluate cotton weed management in no-tillage, strip-tillage and conventional tillage following grain sorghum. Within each tillage system, there is 16 preplanned treatments that vary in the overall herbicide inputs.  Some of the treatments contain up to four residual herbicides, whereas others contain no residual herbicides.  Results will include initial cotton stand, weed control by species, input costs, yield, and net returns above weed control costs.