C. A. Smith1, Thomas Barber2, W. C. Birdsong3, P. H. Jost4, D. R. Krieg2, B. J. Phipps5, W.C. Robertson6, A. M. Stewart7, A. Phillips8, and N. M. French9. (1) University of Florida, IFAS, 2741 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 3, Marianna, FL 32448, (2) Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, 117 Dorman Hall box 9555, Mississippi State, MS 39762, (3) Alabama Cooperative Extension System, Wiregrass Research and Extension Center, 165 E. Al Hwy 134, Headland, AL 36345, (4) University of Georgia, P.O. Box 8112 GSU, Statesboro, GA 30460, (5) University of Missouri-Delta Center, 147 St. Hwy T, Portageville, MO 63873, (6) University of Arkansas Cooperative Ext, P.O. Box 391, Little Rock, AR 72203-0391, (7) LSU AgCenter, Dean Lee Research Station, 8105 Tom Bowman Drive, Alexandria, LA 71302, (8) University of Missouri, Box 160, Portageville, MO 63873, (9) Eden Bioscience Corporation, 15200 Burlingame Road, Little Rock, AR 72223-9618
A regional study consisting of replicated, small plot tests in eight states was initiated to examine the effects of harpinab (ProActTM) on cotton growth and yield. Tests were conducted in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Texas. Each test was conducted by an independent University or Extension scientist. ProAct was applied one or two times to the foliage of DP 444 BG/RR or DP 555 BG/RR cotton. Treatment timings included the two to four leaf stage, eight-leaf stage, and/or first bloom. All plants were grown in replicated field trials. Plant growth and maturity measurements as well as yield were recorded.
![[ Recorded presentation ]](/static/img/filetypes/16x16/wrf.gif)
Recorded presentation
See more of Cotton Physiology Conference - Session B
See more of Cotton Physiology Conference
See more of The Beltwide Cotton Conferences, January 3-6 2006
