Friday, January 12, 2007 - 2:15 PM

Cotton-Based Hydromulches versus Conventional Hydromulches and Blankets: Erosion and Grass Establishment

Greg Holt, USDA-ARS, Cotton Production and Processing Research Unit, 1604 E. FM 1294, Lubbock, TX 79403, Brent Busenlehner, Brent Busenlehner, 3194 FM 1694, Robstown, TX 78380, Elizabeth Guertal, Auburn University, 202 Funchess Hall, Auburn University, AL 36849, Ken Potter, USDA-ARS, 808 E. Blackland Rd., Temple, TX 76502, and Tom Wedegaertner, Cotton Incorporated, 6399 Weston Parkway, Cary, NC 27513.

Finding an economically viable utilization of gin waste (cotton gin byproducts) has been topic of research for decades. Over the past few years, developing processes to add-value to gin waste in order to produce marketable products for use as a livestock feed, fuel, erosion control mulches, and/or building materials has been a primary focus of the USDA-ARS gin lab in Lubbock, TX. This paper reports on issues encountered in developing a cotton gin byproduct based hydromulch as well as reports on several erosion studies comparing the cotton-based hydromulch versus conventional hydromulches (wood and paper). Three erosion studies, conducted in 2006, are detailed in the paper. The last study reports on the development of a super hydromulch known as a BioFiber Mat (BFM).

Recorded presentation